We've sent a verification link by email
Didn't receive the email? Check your Spam folder, it may have been caught by a filter. If you still don't see it, you can resend the verification email.
Started March 9th, 2025 · 26 replies · Latest reply by Sadiquecat 3 days, 22 hours ago
In the meantime, I have added 3 more sounds:
https://freesound.org/people/AlienXXX/sounds/792783/
https://freesound.org/people/AlienXXX/sounds/792786/
https://freesound.org/people/AlienXXX/sounds/792787/
@gis_sweden - You might find this interesting too
All these sounds are also (proof of concept) exploring transformation of a sound via digital clipping. This time I have tried to recreate a multi-fold wave-folding effect.
This marks the end of my experiments with clipping for this dare...
I am now onto exploring other concepts.... More sounds to come shortly...
Surely you realize: by changing the "volume" of every sample, you can transform a starting sound into any sound you want -- with a couple of caveats. If "volume" is defined such that it does not allow changing the sign, then the transformed sample for each input sample will have to have the same sign; and any original sample of 0 will always be 0 no matter how much you try to change its volume.
zimbot wrote:
Surely you realize: by changing the "volume" of every sample, you can transform a starting sound into any sound you want -- with a couple of caveats. If "volume" is defined such that it does not allow changing the sign, then the transformed sample for each input sample will have to have the same sign; and any original sample of 0 will always be 0 no matter how much you try to change its volume.
Hello Zimbot
In theory, you could manipulate the volume of each individual point sample and change the waveform to whatever you wanted. Except zero poits, as you mentioned.
However, since the rules also allow mixing, even those points could be changed by involving more complicated, but allowed, manipulations.
When I posted the dare I expected people to make more use of the allowed copy / cut / paste / mix options, but most of the focus has been entirely on volume. Which, of course, is OK. Not knowing how each dare will develop is part of the fun
AlienXXX wrote:zimbot wrote:
Surely you realize: by changing the "volume" of every sample, you can transform a starting sound into any sound you want -- with a couple of caveats. If "volume" is defined such that it does not allow changing the sign, then the transformed sample for each input sample will have to have the same sign; and any original sample of 0 will always be 0 no matter how much you try to change its volume.Hello Zimbot
In theory, you could manipulate the volume of each individual point sample and change the waveform to whatever you wanted. Except zero poits, as you mentioned.
However, since the rules also allow mixing, even those points could be changed by involving more complicated, but allowed, manipulations.When I posted the dare I expected people to make more use of the allowed copy / cut / paste / mix options, but most of the focus has been entirely on volume. Which, of course, is OK. Not knowing how each dare will develop is part of the fun
https://freesound.org/people/gis_sweden/sounds/794231/
This rule "You can cut / copy / paste..." Also, with cut, copy, and paste, you can transform any sample into anything?? Is it within the rules to copy small samples from a sound and paste them in a row? In this sound (above), I copy small parts of a sound and paste them together, like cutting a tape into small parts and rearranging them.
I start with parts with the size 1500 samples long, then 750, 300, 100, 25, 10.
The original sound, the sound I copy small paarts from is
https://freesound.org/people/blakengouda/sounds/573954/
EDIT::
- 1500 samples... What?
- Well it's almost as long as a hi-hat sound.
https://freesound.org/people/copyc4t/sounds/794355/
As the description says, it's a loopable pulsing buzz obtained mixing two of my previous sounds, https://freesound.org/people/copyc4t/sounds/235640/ and https://freesound.org/people/copyc4t/sounds/235654/
They both got repeated and cut to a common length, each sound went through Audacity's Nyquist tremolo but with prime frequencies, 5 and 7 Hz, and then downmixed.
Made this Industrial Mermaid Sound, combining two sounds this time
More info in description.
https://freesound.org/people/Sadiquecat/sounds/794545/