We've sent a verification link by email
Didn't receive the email? Check your Spam folder, it may have been caught by a filter. If you still don't see it, you can resend the verification email.
Started April 18th, 2013 · 12 replies · Latest reply by Kyster 11 years, 5 months ago
I have been happily using the Zoom H4N and have recorded lots of wonderful nature sounds, and now I am looking to bump up the quality of my nature field-recordings by buying a field recorder with QUIET pre-amps.
BUT, unfortunately I don't have the money for one of those kick-butt Sound Devices machines.....
I done a lot of online research and am just about ready to buy the Tascam DR-680, I have read many users who swear by their QUIET pre-amps.
And, for my price range is looks like the DR-680 would be GREAT., BUT I feel that since I would rarely use or need more than
2 channels for my field recordings, I feel that if I bought the DR-680 I would be spending money for the extra features (more channels)
that I don't need.
I really do not need all 6 channels like the DR-680 provides, plus that is why it takes 8 AA batteries so, my question is:
*What other good field recorders out there with QUIET pre-amps in the $400 to $700 range that are only 2 channel
*I don't need one with built-in Microphones, as I already have a good one (Zoom H4N)
I may end up buying the Tascam DR-680 anyway, but, I wanted to explore this
possibility first.
Thanks for any input you can give me!
Oh, did I mention that the #1 requirement is QUIET pre-amps ??
Kevin
e=mail: kevinboucher1989@yahoo.com
http://www.freesound.org/people/kvgarlic/
https://soundcloud.com/kvgarlic
Check out the R-26 from Roland. Having used both, probably slightly cleaner sound compared to the Zoom...Also Sound Devices do quality battery powered pre's you could then take a line out from into your H4n. Also have a range of field recorders but they are pretty exy...
I purchased the "super" modded Marantz PMD661 from Doug Oade (oade.com).
I forget the exact specs but the modification makes the pre amps slightly quieter than the ones in Sound Devices recorders.
He also modifies other recorders as well and has various modifications for various applications.
At least worth a look if you really want something not very expensive and still very quiet.
Or (2nd hand) sound devices usbpre2 (eventually mixpre-d) via digital to some bit bucket. It could be something as lowly as m-audio microtrack. It's a bit of hassle with all the connections and batteries, but that's what you pay for cheaper solution .
Sony (d50/m10) has quite a quiet pres built-in, all you need is to add some nice box for phantom power. I wonder how good new nagra lino is... it is the same case as d50, you need to add external phantom power solution.
Don't forget mics are also part of the equation. Some cheap large diaphragm Rodes have excelent noise figures, if that's all you care about. Small diaphragm condensers are noisier, but good ones have also superior transient and polar response. So what you get is maybe a bit more noise, but on the other hand much more realistic and deep sounding picture.
Anyway, if it gets really quiet, you can hear some noise even on expensive nagra/sd with sennheiser mkh.
I have a Sony PCM-D50 and, although very good as recorders go, when using low-sensitive mics or recording quiet sources where you need to crank up the gain, it's pres are still noticeably noisier than I've experienced with moderate-priced outboard preamps or audio-interface preamps. Perhaps your solutions is to get a highly sensitive mic (like a shotgun or electret condenser, mic that uses plugin-power) so as not to push your preamps all the way.
kvgarlic wrote:
I have been happily using the Zoom H4N and have recorded lots of wonderful nature sounds, and now I am looking to bump up the quality of my nature field-recordings by buying a field recorder with QUIET pre-amps.
here is a field-recording I did with a Rode NT4 mic in a Sony PCM D50. The NT4 uses it's own 9v power for 48v. I just made a little modification on the cord between recorder and mic.
http://www.freesound.org/people/klankbeeld/sounds/178136/
This is a field-recording of a NT4 in a H4n;
http://www.freesound.org/people/kangaroovindaloo/sounds/182696/
Maybe you can contact this user??
James Collins wrote:
Check out the R-26 from Roland. Having used both, probably slightly cleaner sound compared to the Zoom...Also Sound Devices do quality battery powered pre's you could then take a line out from into your H4n. Also have a range of field recorders but they are pretty exy...
+1 for this recommendation.
I have used many mid-price field recording devices. The R-26 is the best I have come across so far. Although there may be better if you raise the price slightly.
Furthermore, the R26 has so many great features.
A nice source for checking the mic input noise levels:
http://www.avisoft.com/recordertests.htm
Just to second what matucha said, if you're willing to sacrifice mobility a bit, using an external preamp/small interface + bit bucket will probably give you cleaner results in that price range. Echo's Audiofire4 and Audient's mico come to mind, but there are probably many other good options.
Yuval wrote:
A nice source for checking the mic input noise levels:
http://www.avisoft.com/recordertests.htm
Amazing share.
Thank you very much!
this tiny external preamp also looks great and should be in your price range:
I've just bought a Olympus Ls-100. I'd truly recommend it. Preamps and internal mics are fantastic.